Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video1,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These District Of Columbia Politics results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,759 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,666 of 16,562 topics). This District Of Columbia Politics is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
District Of Columbia Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,759
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos