Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dismemberment results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 1,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,905 of 16,562 topics). This Dismemberment is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Dismemberment
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠53%Dismemberment (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos