Topic summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disaster results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 259 hits . Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,779 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,467 of 16,562 topics). This Disaster is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Disaster
Topic details
Total words: 5,779
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst