Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disability Policy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 2,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,389 of 16,244 topics). This Disability Policy is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Disability Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos