Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Director Interviews results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,550 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,965 of 16,559 topics). This Director Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Director Interviews
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠22%Director Interviews (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,550
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos