Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomatic Relations results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,766 of 16,562 topics). This Diplomatic Relations is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Diplomatic Relations
Topic details
Total words: 1,808
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos