Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Preservation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,380 of 16,562 topics). This Digital Preservation is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Digital Preservation
Topic details
Total words: 3,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos