Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diaspora results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 497 hits . Analysis detected 3,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,797 of 16,562 topics). This Diaspora is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Diaspora
Topic details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst