Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dianna Russini Scandal results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 529 hits. Analysis detected 3,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,771 of 15,344 topics). This Dianna Russini Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Dianna Russini Scandal
Topic details
Total words: 1,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.3%20.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.6%28.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos