Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dhs Nomination results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 1,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,278 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,290 of 16,345 topics). This Dhs Nomination is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Dhs Nomination
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠93%Dhs Nomination (selected)10%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,278
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.1% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.6%46.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos