Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Destructivism results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,468 of 16,562 topics). This Destructivism is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Destructivism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.6%27.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 20.1%20.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.9%23.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.5%8.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos