Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Homeland Security Response results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.4% saturation with 745 hits. Analysis detected 3,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,254 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,134 of 16,562 topics). This Department Of Homeland Security Response is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Department Of Homeland Security Response
Topic details
Total words: 1,254
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 59.4%59.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 45.5%45.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.1%26.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 59.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos