Topic summary
31%1 analyzed article/video616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dentistry results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (16,117 of 23,306 topics). This Dentistry is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Dentistry
Topic details
Total words: 2,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos