Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Demonstrators results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 1,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,249 of 16,246 topics). This Demonstrators is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Demonstrators
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos