Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Republic Of Congo results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,110 of 16,562 topics). This Democratic Republic Of Congo is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos