Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Primaries results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,307 hits. Analysis detected 12,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,904 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,678 of 15,142 topics). This Democratic Primaries is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Democratic Primaries
Topic details
Total words: 10,904
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos