Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Party Introspection results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 1,008 hits. Analysis detected 6,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,409 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,955 of 16,562 topics). This Democratic Party Introspection is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Democratic Party Introspection
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠89%Democratic Party Introspection (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,409
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.8%41.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 26.5%26.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 21.7%21.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.3%38.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 38.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos