Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Convention results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,450 of 16,558 topics). This Democratic Convention is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Democratic Convention
Topic details
Total words: 3,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos