Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos1,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrat results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 873 hits. Analysis detected 8,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,885 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (14,768 of 16,152 topics). This Democrat is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Democrat
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,885
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos