Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dementia Prevention results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 6,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,856 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (15,029 of 16,562 topics). This Dementia Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Dementia Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 11,856
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos