Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Demand For Justice results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 717 hits. Analysis detected 4,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Demand For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Demand For Justice
Topic details
Total words: 1,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 55.3%55.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 39.1%39.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 39.5%39.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 23.8%23.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.2%37.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.7%20.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 17.5%17.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 55.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 39.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 39.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos