Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Logistics results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 3,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,957 of 16,562 topics). This Defense Logistics is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Defense Logistics
Topic details
Total words: 2,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos