Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Defense Contracts results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,150 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,245 topics). This Defense Contracts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Defense Contracts
Topic details
Total words: 3,150
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos