Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deepfake Detection results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 263 hits. Analysis detected 2,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,570 of 16,413 topics). This Deepfake Detection is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Deepfake Detection
Topic details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos