Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos2,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Sea Mining results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,049 hits. Analysis detected 7,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,828 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,421 of 16,562 topics). This Deep Sea Mining is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Deep Sea Mining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,828
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos