Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Decommissioning results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,599 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,259 topics). This Decommissioning is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Decommissioning
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,599
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.3%16.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos