Topic summary
78%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deadpool results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (4,924 of 15,447 topics). This Deadpool is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Deadpool
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,446
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos