Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video1,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dea Regulation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 2,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,731 of 16,559 topics). This Dea Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Dea Regulation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos