Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dc Comics results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 2,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,715 of 16,562 topics). This Dc Comics is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Dc Comics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos