Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Ortiz results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 311 hits. Analysis detected 3,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,679 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,815 of 16,562 topics). This David Ortiz is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
David Ortiz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,679
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos