Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Ellison results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This David Ellison is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David Ellison
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%David Ellison (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos