Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video1,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating Violence results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Representativeness Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 1,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (19,616 of 22,505 topics). This Dating Violence is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Dating Violence
Topic details
Total words: 5,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos