Topic summary
74%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Sovereignty results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,912 of 16,300 topics). This Data Sovereignty is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Data Sovereignty
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,010
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos