Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Management results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,330 hits . Analysis detected 11,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,238 of 16,559 topics). This Data Management is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Data Management
Topic details
Total words: 11,592
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst