Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Leakage results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,314 of 16,562 topics). This Data Leakage is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Data Leakage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos