Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Data Collection Practices results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 2,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Data Collection Practices is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Data Collection Practices
Topic details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst