Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Center Expansion results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 363 hits. Analysis detected 2,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,619 of 16,562 topics). This Data Center Expansion is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Data Center Expansion
Topic details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos