Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,052 hits. Analysis detected 8,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,767 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,282 of 16,562 topics). This Data is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Data
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,767
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos