Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darfur results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,139 of 16,562 topics). This Darfur is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Darfur
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos