Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Isd Bonds results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 743 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (21,301 of 23,582 topics). This Dallas Isd Bonds is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Dallas Isd Bonds
Topic details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.0%0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos