Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas City Council results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 318 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,107 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,178 of 23,542 topics). This Dallas City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Dallas City Council
Topic details
Total words: 1,107
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos