Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Horoscopes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 1,856 hits . Analysis detected 5,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,975 of 16,562 topics). This Daily Horoscopes is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Daily Horoscopes
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 39.8% 39.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 29.1% 29.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Indoctrination: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 29.1%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst