Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Horoscopes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 1,856 hits. Analysis detected 5,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,975 of 16,562 topics). This Daily Horoscopes is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Daily Horoscopes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 39.8%39.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 29.1%29.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 29.1%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos