Topic summary
⁠97%4 analyzed articles/videos2,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Horoscope results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 8,080 hits. Analysis detected 23,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,500 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,726 of 16,562 topics). This Daily Horoscope is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Daily Horoscope
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,500
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 43.7%43.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Topic 43.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.6%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos