Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Threats results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 3,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,558 of 16,562 topics). This Cybersecurity Threats is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Cybersecurity Threats
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠31%Cybersecurity Threats (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,811
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos