Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Strategy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 517 hits. Analysis detected 3,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,159 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,617 of 16,562 topics). This Cybersecurity Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Cybersecurity Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 3,159
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 13.7%13.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.4%16.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos