Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Risks results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,613 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,512 of 16,562 topics). This Cybersecurity Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Cybersecurity Risks
Topic details
Total words: 2,613
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos