Topic summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity Incidents results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 3,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,417 of 23,113 topics). This Cybersecurity Incidents is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Cybersecurity Incidents
Topic details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos