Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyber Threats results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 1,069 hits. Analysis detected 4,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,770 of 16,277 topics). This Cyber Threats is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Cyber Threats
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,083
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.2%26.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos