Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video749 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyber Extortion results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,894 of 16,562 topics). This Cyber Extortion is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Cyber Extortion
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos