Topic summary
81%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cvs Pharmacy results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 1,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,481 of 15,526 topics). This Cvs Pharmacy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Cvs Pharmacy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 969
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles969 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 33.5%33.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos